Mr.
Hummel stated this was the second 2009 budget special meeting. He
stated it addressed the issue of building expansion, with a
long-term concept plan for expansion and current interim for space
needs.
He stated in 2004 a needs assessment was done for the Police
facilities with an expansion for 35,000-40,000 square feed. He
stated all the alternatives previously discussed were rejected. He
continued different sites were looked at and a campus site was the
preference. He stated there were two options that would be discussed
tonight.
Option A was the alternative that included the acquisition of the
property immediately to the east of the Public Works building,
specifically, the Mid-America building. He stated we were in
discussions with the property owner. Once acquired, we would
eventually demolish the building and relocate the salt storage
structure, having then a large parcel to construct a new Police
building. He stated it would cost approximately $20-25 million. This
would be the recommended long-term space solution.
The bond issue was questioned, using smaller amounts such as $10
million to begin the project, and add another $10 million as needed
later. It was also questioned if the State had any low interest or
no interest loans available and answered it was not known at this
time. It was also questioned on the sunset clause in the transfer
tax ordinance, if a referendum would be needed and answered no, that
it could be dovetailed and layered in with alternative revenues to
continue. It was also suggested if we could find other monies, it
would be beneficial.
Mr. Dean Roberts of PSA Dewbery, the architect, addressed the
board with the specific alternatives. He began with stating we
currently had 11.8 acres and 249 parking spaces. He drew attention
to the number of parking spaces because Option A increases the
number of parking spaces and Option B decreases the number. He noted
that the Police Department occupied 16,500 square feet of space and
with off-site storage increased the square footage to 18,000. He
noted the Village Hall had 34,300 square feet.
Mr. Roberts stated Option A would acquire the Mid-America land,
making it contiguous with the Village property. The plan would
demolish the Mid-America building, it would reposition the salt
storage dome and the Butler building, and would include an
additional 130 parking spaces. It would remodel the old Police
Station to be used for other departments. He noted the cost for
Option A was $19-27 million.
It was questioned how the new Police building compared to the
Streamwood Police Department, and answered it was 40,000 square
feet, approximately the same size as new Police Department.
Mr. Roberts continued that Option B would expand the Village Hall
and Police Department utilizing land on the south side. He noted
this would take away parking spaces from the current 249 spaces to
229 spaces. He also noted it would take a series of remodeling,
moving various departments throughout the remodeling process. He
stated it would cost anywhere from $18.9 million to $25.6 million.
Discussions followed regarding the breakdown of timelines, the
series of remodeling, moving various departments during remodeling,
soft costs, etc.
Suggestions were made regarding the addition of two-three
stories, and the architect stated that could cause bigger headaches
than not, making serious compromises, and not really saving any
monies.
It was questioned if the remodeling meant making the facilities
ADA accessible and Mr. Roberts stated we would definitely have to
comply with all requirements. Other suggestions included moving the
salt storage dome to a site across the railroad tracks off of Devon
Avenue. It was noted the time to get trucks to load salt would go
from 5 minutes to 45 minutes possibly in heavy traffic and that did
not make it feasible.
It was also noted keeping the municipality in one campus seemed
to be the choice rather than splitting departments to various sites
throughout the village. A concurrence was taken for Option A. ALL
Ayes.
Mr. Hummel stated there was a second component and that was the
FY’09 budget needed to include the land acquisition and the
professional services to implement Option A, that these were major
capital expenditures. He also stated we needed to prepare for the
issuance of two $10 million bonds. It was also noted the completion
for Option A was 2012.
Mr. Roberts made the observation that we had a rare opportunity
to take advantage of purchasing the property directly next to us in
order to keep the campus as a whole.
Mr. Hummel continued that the interim use of the facilities was
extremely problematic and there was no readily identifiable
solution. He noted to use the Board Room for the Police personnel
for 2-3 years was not his recommendation, as it was needed for other
things, such as Board meetings, Vehicle Impoundment hearings,
various Human Resource activities, etc. His concerns were the
alternatives such going to the Park District, or utilizing the Fire
Department facilities. He did not feel these were viable solutions
but he was unable to offer alternatives, much to his dismay. It was
suggested that other departments move out the municipal building or
use trailers or other modules. Various discussions followed
regarding security, expanding on the Public Works building, keeping
the same architectural design with the new building, and beginning
as soon as possible before construction costs started to skyrocket.
There was no real solution identified and it was suggested that
Board members and Department heads give their input to Mr. Hummel
with their interim and critical needs. Comments made were that some
trustees did not want relinquish to Board Room.
It was further noted that members of the Board were very happy to
keep the municipal campus rather than splitting departments
throughout the Village.
President Craig adjourned the workshop at 8:55 p.m.