Board of Trustees Minutes
|
|
MEETING:
REGULAR BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING
VILLAGE OF HANOVER PARK |
|
DATE:
FEBRUARY 21, 2008 |
|
LOCATION: MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2121 West Lake Street
Hanover Park, IL 60133
|
|
1. CALL
TO ORDER - ROLL CALL President Craig called the Meeting to Order
at 7:39 P.M.
PRESENT: Trustees Joseph Nicolosi, Robert Packham, Wesley Eby,
William Manton, Toni Carter, Lori Kaiser, and President Rodney Craig
ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Village Manager Marc Hummel and Corporation Counsel
Norman E. Samelson
|
| Pledge of Allegiance |
2.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE All joined in the Pledge of Allegiance.
President Craig asked that they remain standing while Fire Chaplain
Jenny Swanson offered a word of prayer and asked for a moment of
silence for the victims of Northern Illinois University tragedy last
week.
President Craig thanked the Chaplain. He read the Governor’s
Proclamation of February 15, 2008 regarding the tragedy on the
campus of Northern Illinois University. In the proclamation, the
Governor proclaimed a period of mourning for NIU victims in Illinois
and ordered all State facilities to fly the flag at half staff until
February 23, 2008.
President Craig stated upon receiving the Proclamation, the
Village lowered the flags to show support. He noted there were many
stopped hearts not only in this community but in this building,
because there were youth of our employees who were there, and one
who was in the class and witnessed it.
|
| Approved: Placed Items on
Consent Agenda
Approved: Consent Agenda
Appointments: Rey
Hernandez and Dan Flowers to the CONECT Committee; Pamela Fowler to
the Sister City Committee; Wm Cannon to the Development Commission,
all with Terms to Expire 4/30/09
Passed ORD O-08-14:
Authorizing the 2nd Amend. to the 2007-2008 Budget
Authorized: Payment of
$37,222.14 to the Cook Co. Collector for Liability Amount on the
2006 Tax Levy for SSA#2
Approved: Three Year
Contract for the Creek Bank Turf Maintenance to Alaniz Landscaping
Group in an Amount Not to Exceed $18,206.00
Approved: Contract for the Security
Improvemts. to Two Water Tanks at Village Hall & Sewage Treatment
Plant Vault to Strand Associates, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed
$13,800.00
Removed: From the Table
RES R-08-02:
Passed RES R-08-02: Endorsing the Metro.
Mayors Caucus’ Greenest Region Compact
Approved: Funding
Agreement with the Hanover Park Chamber of Commerce & Industry
Approved: Contract for
the Purchase of 22 Dell Optiplex 755 Computers w/Monitors to Dell in
an Amount Not to Exceed $26,281.20 5-
Approved: Contract for the Purchase of 22
MS Office Pro Licenses to CDWG in an Amount Not to Exceed $6,542.36
Passed ORD O-08-15:
Authorizing Execution of an Annexation Agreement…
Passed ORD O-08-16: Annexing Property to
the Village…
Passed ORD O-08-17:
Amending the Compre-hensive Plan…
Passed ORD O-08-18:
Granting Variations for an Increase …
Passed RES R-08-04:
Approving the Prelim. Plat of Subdivision…
Waived Reading and Approved Minutes of:
Workshop – Feb 4 ‘08
Public Hearing Fisher Scientific – Feb 7 ‘08
Public Hearing – Lake/ Bartels Annex–Feb 7 ‘08
Reg Board – Feb 7 ‘08
Workshop – Feb 11 ‘08 |
3.
ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Motion by Trustee Manton and seconded to
Place Items 5-A.1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19,
20, 21, 22, and 7-A.1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 on a Consent Agenda. Roll
call:
AYES: Nicolosi, Packham, Eby, Manton, Carter, Kaiser, and
President Craig
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried – Placed Items 5-A.1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 7-A.1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 on a
Consent Agenda
Motion by Trustee Manton and seconded to Adopt the Consent
Agenda. Roll call:
AYES: Nicolosi, Packham, Eby, Manton, Carter, Kaiser, and
President Craig
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried – Adopted the Consent Agenda
5-A.1 Appointed Rey Hernandez and Dan Flowers to the CONECT
Committee with a Term to Expire April 30, 2009.
5-A.2 Appointed Pamela Fowler to the Sister City Committee with a
Term to Expire April 30, 2009.
5-A.3 Appointed William Cannon to the Development Commission with
a Term to Expire April 30, 2009.
5-A.8 Passed Ordinance O-08-14: Authorizing the Second Amendment
to the 2007-2008 Budget of the Village of Hanover Park.
5-A.9 Authorized the Payment of $37,222.14 to the Cook County
Collector for the Liability Amount on the 2006 Tax Levy for SSA#2.
5-A.10 Awarded a Three Year Contract for the Creek Bank Turf
Maintenance to Alaniz Landscaping Group in an Amount Not to Exceed
$18,206.00 and Authorized the Village Manager to Execute the
Contract Documents.
5-A.11 Awarded the Contract for the Security Improvements to the
Two Water Tanks at Village Hall and a Sewage Treatment Plant Vault
to Strand Associates, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed $13,800.00 and
Authorized the Village Manager to Execute the Contract Documents.
5-A.12 Removed from the Table Resolution R-08-02: Endorsing the
Metropolitan Mayors Caucus’ Greenest Region Compact.
5-A.13 Passed Resolution R-08-02: Endorsing the Metropolitan
Mayors Caucus’ Greenest Region Compact.
5-A.14 Approved the Funding Agreement with the Hanover Park
Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Authorized the Village Manager
to Execute the Agreement.
5-A.16 Awarded the Contract for the Purchase of 22 Dell Optiplex
755 Computers with Monitors to Dell in an Amount Not to Exceed
$26,281.20 and Authorized the Village Manager to Issue a Purchase
Order.
5-A.17 Awarded the Contract for the Purchase of 22 Microsoft
Office Pro Licenses to CDWG in an Amount Not to Exceed $6,542.36 and
Authorized the Village Manager to Issue a Purchase Order.
5-A.18 Passed Ordinance O-08-15: Authorizing the Execution of an
Annexation Agreement Providing for the Annexation to the Village of
Hanover Park (Lake Bartels L.L.C. Property – Northeast Corner Lake
Street and Bartels Road) and the Development of Such Property.
5-A.19 Passed Ordinance O-08-16: Annexing Property to the Village
of Hanover Park (Lake Bartels, L.L.C. Property – Northeast Corner of
Lake Street and Bartels Road).
5-A.20 Passed Ordinance O-08-17: Amending the Comprehensive Plan
Designation and Establishing the Zoning Classification of the Lake
Bartels, L.L.C. Property Located at the Northeast Corner of Lake
Street and Bartels Road and Annexed to the Village Pursuant to
Ordinance 0-08-16.
5-A.21 Passed Ordinance O-08-18: Granting Variations for an
Increase in the Permitted Lot Coverage and to Permit the Continued
Use of the Existing Well and Septic System for Property Located at
the Northeast Corner of Lake Street and Lake Bartels Road Hanover
Park, Illinois.
5-A.22 Passed Resolution R-08-04: Approving the Preliminary Plat
of Subdivision for the Lake Bartels, L.L.C. Property.
7-A.1 Waived the Reading and Approved the Minutes of the Board
Workshop – Police Department of February 4, 2008, as Published.
7-A.2 Waived the Reading and Approve the Minutes of the Public
Hearing – Fisher Scientific Annexation Amendment of February 7,
2008, as Published.
7-A.3 Waived the Reading and Approve the Minutes of the Public
Hearing – Lake/Bartels Annexation Agreement of February 7, 2008, as
Published.
7-A.4 Waived the Reading and Approve the Minutes of the Regular
Board of Trustees’ Meeting of February 7, 2008, as Published.
7-A.5 Waived the Reading and Approve the Minutes of the Board
Workshop – Building Expansion of February 11, 2008, as Published. |
|
Passed ORD O-08-12:
Amending the Basset Program Requirements and Penalty for Late
Filing of Renewal Applications for Hanover Park Liquor Licenses |
5-A.4
Motion by Trustee Manton and seconded to Pass Ordinance O-08-12:
Amending the Basset Program Requirements and the Penalty for Late
Filing of Renewal Applications for Hanover Park Liquor Licenses.
It was noted that during the last Liquor Commission Hearing there
was discussion about a training course possibly run by the Village
for Not-for-profits, and it was questioned where we were at with
this. President Craig stated it was his understanding we were
looking at an approval process from the Police Department. He stated
we currently had ECC and Harper College, and we did receive an offer
for a no-charge class for our festival through Harper College.
President Craig stated the not-for-profit was the Lions Club in
conjunction with selling beer at a festival, with specialized
training for that environment. Roll call:
AYES: Nicolosi, Packham, Eby, Manton, Carter, Kaiser NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried – Passed Ordinance O-08-12: Amending the Basset
Program Requirements and the Penalty for Late Filing of Renewal
Applications for Hanover Park Liquor Licenses
|
|
Passed ORD RD O-08-12:13: Deleting the Position of Village
Collector in the Village of Hanover Park |
5-A.5
Motion by Trustee Kaiser and seconded to Pass Ordinance O-08-12:
13: Deleting the Position of Village Collector in the Village of
Hanover Park.
Trustee Carter stated she had a concern with the motion being
made at the closing at the last meeting. She questioned if Human
Resources and the Legal Department had been consulted on this issue
or if the Finance Department had been consulted in absorbing this
position into their responsibilities. She noted on the internet
there was a comment by Trustee Manton posted indicating that there
were Board discussions, and she stated this was in violation of the
Open Meetings Act, as she was not informed of any such meetings. She
also had four issues: 1) Retaliatory Firing; 2) Bad Timing; 3) Age
Discrimination; and 4) Discrimination based on Affiliation (Mayor’s
wife). She stated she was also concerned about the Finance
Department taking over the Collector’s job. She stated that since
there no basic changes in the Finance Department recently, she
questioned why this was not done 10 or 15 years ago. She also stated
this position elimination was never discussed at the Board Retreat
in November. She questioned why this could not wait until the end of
Mrs. Craig’s term.
Trustee Carter commented that this game playing needed to stop.
She continued there were 350 homes foreclosed in this Village, there
were people who needed jobs, we had a shortage of police officers,
we had two entire rental communities that had gone down the tubes,
our DARE program was not re-activated even though we had several
drug busts, and it took a month or two to get any action from this
Board.
President Craig asked those wishing to speak to please step up to
the microphone and state your name and address.
Kevin Swan, stated he owned a business on Devon Avenue. He wanted
to share what Sherry Craig meant to him. He stated 5 years ago he
moved his business into this Village and she assisted him with his
business license. He noted because of her concern going the extra
mile for him, he has volunteered his time and efforts to the
Village. He said without the welcome he received from her, the
outcome for his volunteering may have been a different story. He
gave his thanks and stated he supported her.
Mr. Swan also read a letter from Gail Tobin, the Hanover Park
Branch Library Coordinator, and Hanover Park CONECT Chairperson, who
was unable to attend. Ms. Tobin wrote she was saddened to learn of
these events. She noted while she could not comment on the budget
issues, she could comment on the integrity of Sherry Craig in the
time she had known her. She wrote her conduct had been above
reproach and she had gone out of her way to be informative and
welcoming to everyone. She noted that Mrs. Craig did far more than
just collect bills for the Village, from the first time she came to
the Village to volunteer for the CONECT Committee, she had been an
invaluable resource to help guide and support the work of the
community. She further noted she had never done anything to tarnish
the image of Hanover Park. She ended by commenting you could not
argue Sherry Craig ‘s integrity or dismiss the evidence of her
service to the community. She hoped the trustees would not end 20
years of service to the community on such a negative note and would
reconsider eliminating the Collector’s position so abruptly and in
the middle of an elected official’s term. She noted Sherry Craig
would be sorely missed and difficult to replace.
Mike Wang, resident and homeowner, stated he and neighbors had
come to rely on Mrs. Craig at the Village Hall, noting she would
help you if you had a problem. He stated by eliminating this
position would leave a huge void in our Village staff and hoped they
would reconsider this move.
Pamela Hailey, 1136 Westchester Drive, addressed the Board and
stated she lived in Hanover Park for 13 years. She stated she heard
a lot of great things about Sherry Craig, and she felt the
elimination of this position seemed short-sighted and very quick.
She stated it was about handling business in an appropriate manner
and noted she did not feel that was done.
Tom Schaeffer, President of Hanover Square Condominiums, stated
he was not thrilled when he heard the news about this. He stated he
knew Sherry very well on a personal level and she was invaluable in
helping his Association as well as many other associations. He was
personally worried who would assist him and asked the Trustees to
re-think this through. He stated Sherry was the face of the Village
and he would truly miss her and felt Hanover Park would be a less
friendly place without her.
Dr. Arlene Rodriguez, Owner of Hanover Park Animal Care Center,
stated she was shocked to hear the news. She stated 12 years ago she
met Sherry and Irv Bock and invested her life savings to stay here.
She stated because of Sherry and her vision to what Hanover Park
would and should be, she decided to stay. She commented Sherry
involved herself in many ways and was the face of Hanover Park. She
stated she was very unsettled how this whole thing came down. She
noted it shaked her trust in the Village and the way it was handled
was appalling. She stated you do not let a colleague go in the last
minutes of a meeting, after over 20 years; it was not the right
procedure, it was very unprofessional, and it made the trustees look
quite bad and she hoped upon election time, people would see this.
Jeffrey Bates, resident for 32 years, stated he was personally
involved with the Village for over 10 years. He commented they were
talking about the leading collector’s position, not the Village
Clerk. He stated Sherry was a very good Village Clerk, she had
welcomed everybody, she was the face here, but he noted we were
about the leading collector. He stated she was still the Village
Clerk, and if the Village was strapped that much financially, it was
probably the best alternative they had. He noted other positions
were eliminated such as a CSO and there was no outcry.
Unfortunately, he stated, it was the way business was done.
Rob Laschinski, 1725 Windjammer, noted he’s been a resident for
30 years. He stated he was not politically connected but he stated
he was first involved regarding the arterial fence on his block. He
stated at that time he tried to contact Village management and was
very dissatisfied with the response. He then called the Trustee
call-in program and was extremely dissatisfied as most of the
trustees decided his issue was not important enough to reconsider.
He stated then the fence came to the east end of Windjammer and
several residents came before the Board seeking help. He stated the
only person who came to his block and actually saw what was going on
was Mayor Craig. He stated residents came before the board and
begged for help and no one seemed to care. He stated their only
access to democracy was by the elected officials and those of you
who mistreated us with your vindictive vote, and the decision to
build the defective fence and expose residents to carbon monoxide
and debris and litter and noise, and the degradation of property
values. He stated to do this in a way which was obviously
politically vindictive to make the Mayor look bad or somehow hurt
the Mayor was unforgivable. He stated now he was politically active
and he was determined to see that all who come for re-election, to
not be re-elected. He stated they desecrated democracy.
Pastor Larry Greathouse stated he had been pastoring here for 10
years. He stated he heard some of the same things shared here for
coming to Hanover Park and he had a question for the board: What due
diligence was done in this decision, or was it done, was there any
process?
He stated he would never eliminate a position without some due
diligence or process, or discussion with that individual. He noted
the integrity of this process was terrible and he felt it hurt the
integrity of the Village and it was shamefully done. He also stated
if it were strictly a budgetary move, then we wanted to know why the
Village was in such a dire need that they had to immediately
terminate this position. He questioned the integrity of this board
and he supported this community and he felt this hurt the
community’s reputation. He again questioned what due diligence was
done, what was the plan, how was this done and why was this done.
President Craig asked the Board if they wanted to answer these
questions.
Trustee Carter addressed the issue and stated legally there
should not have been any due diligence done because she was not
notified of any discussion regarding this position. She stated she
would like to think none was done but based upon Trustee Manton’s
posting on the internet, she stated she believed the Unity Party had
been having discussions she was not privy to. She stated this was
not something that the Village had to do. She stated this Village
was not strapped for cash, we had millions of dollars in the bank,
so she agreed due diligence should have been done. She stated a lot
of this was emotionalism and retaliatory measures. She stated what
she was hearing tonight was the voters were tired of the games, they
were tired of business as usual, and she stated it needed to stop
and we needed to get down to helping the people of Hanover Park.
Trustee Manton addressed the comment made by Trustee Carter
regarding a posting on the internet. He clarified the discussion
referred to was when Sonya Crawshaw was the Mayor, not a discussion
in recent time.
Phil McBride, resident since 1983 and business owner since 1994,
stated many people said many good things. He stated what was at
issued was how people were handled, how people were dealt with and
whether or not the process was fair, reasonable or appropriate. He
stated when people are treated unfairly through an elimination like
that of the Collector’s position, what happens is the best and
brightest employees will look twice before coming here.
Debra McDonnell, resident stated she lost her son last year, and
stated Sherry Craig always had a smile and was willing to help, she
was had also been loving, compassionate towards me and my family,
and she truly appreciated her and all she did. She asked them to
reconsider, not only the Clerk, but as a person, she played a
valuable role and the love shown here made her want to stay. She
asked the Board to reconsider.
Patricia Langenstrass, stated she has known Sherry 17 years, and
has worked with her for many years in a professional capacity. She
worked with Sherry when she was Village trustee in Streamwood, a
trustee in Hanover Township, and now as the new Executive Director
of the Hanover Park Chamber of Commerce. She stated Sherry was the
impetus in getting the Chamber and she stated by listening to those
speak tonight, Sherry touched every facet of this community, and it
would be a shame to lose her presence in the Village on a daily
basis.
Anita Komorski, business owner and resident, and stated she had
an uneasy feeling because this was never on the agenda, was not
listed as an agenda item to be discussed, and it was voted in
underhandedly, in her opinion. She asked for concrete reasons
individually why the trustees wanted this position removed. She
stated she was told the majority of Mrs. Craig’s salary came from
the Water & Sewer budget, not from the general fund. She stated at
the last meeting she was told that the Water &Sewer money budget had
to stay balanced at all times. She stated she hated to see the head
cut off and the tree dies. She asked the board to individually stand
up and let her know why and what the reasoning was and how we could
avoid this. She stated since this position hadn’t been eliminated
all these years, since the last time it was supposedly discussed was
with Sonya Crawshaw, it seemed odd that now it was so important. She
asked them to reconsider this, express why it was important to do it
right this budget year, and convince her to be on their side at
election time.
Glenn Dailey, architect and businessman in town stated he used to
live here . He stated we were all expendable and replaceable. He
stated he had had confrontations with Sherry Craig but there were
procedures that had to be followed. He noted he was on two
committees and he was still going to give 110%, but he stated they
could not have special meetings unless it was in the newspapers, and
there were procedures.
Rob Laschinski stated the budgetary issue was that the driver to
eliminate the collector had him confused since just a few months ago
a majority of this board voted to spend $90,000 on a section of
fence nobody wanted. He stated since we were talking about a tight
budget, he questioned why they spent $90,000 on something that
didn’t help the residents and that he was hurt by the fence, not
helped by it.
Sherry asked to address the Board. She stated she has been here
for 23 years. She continued that she first ran with Sonya Crawshaw
when she ran for Mayor and she asked her to run for Clerk. She noted
at the time she had a career and was told that the Clerk/Collector
were one and the same. She stated she made decisions for the
residents of this community, for the businessmen of the community as
well as for her family. Every four years when she re-ran for
election, the Collector position was part of the Clerk position that
paid her salary and her decision was made on that basis. She stated
she believed that the residents in this community are the heart of
the Village of Hanover Park and the business men in this community
are the soul of the Village of Hanover Park. She stated she enjoyed
working with each and every one of them. She commented that she was
very disappointed with the way this came down; that we had budget
retreats and positions were eliminated over the 23 years and added.
She noted she vehemently spoke against eliminating the Code
Enforcement position last year because we had come a long way to
clean up areas in our community. She stated she understood if they
wanted to eliminate the position of Collector but she asked them to
eliminate the position at the end of the term of the Village Clerk
so that anyone who would go into an election would know what they
are running for and what they were up against so that the residents
who were voting for that person would know what they were going to
get by that position. She stated by State law, the only position
that she could hold was the position of Collector. The position of
Collector was set by State statute that an elected official could
hold in a municipal government the position of Collector as a
full-time position. She stated people on the Board have said that
they did not know what she did. She noted she did not sit at a desk
behind a computer. She stated she was a working supervisor. As an
example, she stated on Tuesday, 580 people walked into her office to
pay their water bills; 168 people over the weekend put their
payments in the drop box; 416 people paid their bill by mail - all
on Tuesday. She noted she has 3 people that work in Collections,
that handle phones, the counter, and over the years more had been
given and it was handled. From the time a police officer writes a
ticket, the ticket came to her office, all the data entry was done
in the Collections Department, the collections of the monies were
done in the Collections Department, court dates were set in the
Collections Department. When you implemented the transfer tax, that
all fell into the Collections Department. Those documents were
processed in her department, they’re given to attorneys and realtors
and residents to record out of her department, and they come back
from the county through her department. When you enacted a vehicle
immobilization policy, all of those dollars come through her
department, all of the paperwork came through her department, all of
the spreadsheets were done in her department. There’s a Hearing
Officer twice a month, all of those documents came through her
department, both before the hearing and after the hearing. It’s a
very busy department, extremely.
When you enacted nice things, such as the Maxwell Street West
twice a year, and the Harvest Fest, all of that was handled through
the Collections Department. She noted she had never charged the
Village any comp time, any overtime, ever, in the 23 years that she
had been here.
She reiterated she was very disappointed when it wasn’t part of
the budget discussions. It’s always come through Mr. Hummel and his
budget team when there were situations or when there were employees
or positions that needed to be rearranged. She stated she was
disappointed that there was no discussion at the budget retreats and
was disappointed to see that it was just a direction that was given
for a vote to be taken at the next meeting. She also stated in her
own opinion, that it was very vindictive, not only to the position
that you want to eliminate but to her personally. She also asked
that if you wanted to get rid of the position that you do so at the
end of the Village Clerk’s term, which would be April 30, 2009, so
that everybody who would run in the next election for the position
of Village Clerk would be on an even playing field and the residents
and the business men in this community would know what they were
dealing with.
Frank Dominowski, stated he was an employee here for 34 years and
had seen first hand, many times, Sherry’s concern for residents, for
employees, for everyone around. He commented just listening, you
were hearing people’s hearts. He stated there were jobs to be done,
and it was the trustees’ job to help the residents. He stated that
was what was on his heart just listening to all those people to not
eliminate this position.
President Craig asked if there was any discussion from the Board.
There was none. Roll call:
AYES: Packham, Eby, Manton, Kaiser NAYS: Nicolosi, Carter
ABSENT: None
Motion carried – Deleting the Position of Village Collector in
the Village of Hanover Park
President Craig recessed the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
President Craig reconvened the meeting at 8:49 p.m.
PRESENT: Trustees Joseph Nicolosi, Robert Packham, Wesley Eby,
William Manton, Toni Carter, Lori Kaiser, and President Rodney Craig
|
|
Tabled RES R-08-03: Until the 1st meeting in April |
5-A.6
Motion by Trustee Packham and seconded to Pass Resolution R-08-03:
Urging the General Assembly to Stop Making Costly Benefit
Improvements and Adopt Reforms that Protect Police and Fire
Pensions.
Mr. Hummel stated several municipal agencies including the
Illinois Municipal League were asking that municipalities support a
legislative effort to raise awareness related to public safety
pension plans. He stated these plans were consuming an ever greater
portion of the payroll costs for the Village and specifically with
ours, we had seen increases far in excess of inflationary increases.
He stated this particular plan had two emphases: 1) to provide
legislators information as it related to the public costs; and 2) to
take necessary steps to ensure the solvency of those plans. Mr.
Hummel stated the municipality was the obligated party as it related
to funding these and we all needed to be aware of those escalating
costs and do everything that we could to protect their solvency.
President Craig noted that in the submission there was no data in
the blocks, and Mr. Hummel stated he did not specifically provide
the data, the prior information as it related to the actuarial
studies. He stated the information in the more regional statewide
explanations was pertinent and reflective of the issues faced in
Hanover Park.
Trustee Manton commented that he did not want to send the message
for them to stop approving new and increased pension benefits, but
rather to include the necessary funding sources, etc. Mr. Hummel
clarified that it was to stop the enhanced benefits, and that we
were interested in improving the pension fund by maintaining its
solvency, but to add additional benefits, i.e. enhancements, making
further costs passed onto the municipalities. He further added two
years ago we had to take general fund reserves at the end of the
year to try to bring the unfunded liability up (meaning to improve
it). He noted typically the legislators approved unfunded mandates
and never had he seen a public safety pension fund that came with
funding from Springfield. He stated it was passed on and that was
being said. Trustee Manton agreed with Mr. Hummel; however, he would
like to say if they approved new and increased pension benefits to
include the revenues source to go with it. He felt this gave the
message that we did not support new and increased public safety
pension benefits.
President Craig commented that he was deeply engaged in this with
the Northwest Municipal League, DuPage Mayors and Managers, and with
all our legislators, and he stated they were of the same mindset
that we had to find a way to get this under control. He addressed
the funding a few years ago, and once the actuarial explained it
all, our Village was not in bad shape; in fact, better than most. He
further commented our State legislators locally had taken the lead
in some of this and he would be there dialoging with them. President
Craig stated he wished to sit down with Firefighters, Police and our
legislators to get the issues on the table and to try to find a way
to find a balance. Other trustees agreed with President Craig and
noted his point was well taken. Trustees agreed to support his
initiative.
Motion by Trustee Manton and seconded to Table this Resolution
until the first meeting in April. Roll call:
AYES: Nicolosi, Packham, Eby, Manton, Carter, Kaiser NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
Tabled this Resolution until the first meeting in April.
|
|
Motion Carried: Called the Question
Approved: 50th Anniv. Family Festival Carnival
Agreement with Fantasy Amusement Company, Inc. as written |
5-A.7
Motion by Trustee Packham and seconded to Authorize a 50th
Anniversary Family Festival Carnival Agreement with Fantasy
Amusement Company, Inc. and Authorize the Village Manager to Execute
the Contract Documents.
Mr. Bill Johnson, President of Fantasy Amusement Company,
addressed the Board regarding some issues on the contract. He stated
it had to do with his company selling soft drinks noting the past
three years he worked with the Park District and had sold soft
drinks from his two food stands and he made profits off of that. He
stated these last three years his insurance costs had doubled, fuel
costs had tripled, and with minimum wages, his payroll increased. He
noted when he last worked with the Village in 2002 or 2003, he was
not allowed to sell soft drinks because the non-profit groups served
them. He stated he allowed that because the event with the Village
went on for a number of years, and now the event with the Park
District had been going on for a number of years. He stated he would
give the non-profit groups selling soft drinks $500 to allow him to
sell soft drinks. He also noted reference items 3A, B, and C, noting
the up to numbers. He stated in the 3 years with the Park District,
he has had 16 rides in that area and did not feel he could get any
more rides, due to the fact the he could not utilize the parking
area any more. He requested those items be changed from up to 9
kiddie rides, to between 7-9 kiddie rides, and 7-8 adult rides. He
also added section 12 with trucks and trailers on site, it was
easier to keep the tilt-a-whirl trailer on site than off-site.
Mr. Hummel stated that staff did not concur with Mr. Johnson’s
recommendations and stated he believed that soda and water should be
sold as it was in the Harvest Fest days for the not-for-profits. He
stated they made substantial charitable benefits in excess of the
financial consideration that Mr. Johnson had offered. He also stated
that the vehicles, other than essential, should be parked at the
Village, as it was better appearance, provided more room, and that
it worked better. He also stated with regard to the "up to" issue
that the proposed language could hypothetically mean 1 kiddie ride.
Mr. Johnson agreed, but Mr. Hummel stated they were looking for a
good balance between the adult rides and the kiddie rides. He stated
the language as currently provided was appropriate.
Mr. Hummel stated the negotiations for the contract had been done
and this was staff’s recommendations and they asked for the Board’s
support of the contract as proposed. The cost of the carnival was
questioned and Mr. Hummel stated that the carnival cost including
entertainment was in excess of $100,000 and he assured Mr. Johnson
that there was going to be a great deal more of attendance than what
he dealt with in the past three years. He also noted this was a 50th
anniversary and the Village was sincerely attempting to provide the
residents as well as the region a free entertainment endeavor, and
felt it would serve all purposes well including the carnival. It was
noted costs were also incurred by Public Works personnel, overtime
over the weekend, Fire Department and Police Department personnel
time and overtime, and also this year Finance Department personnel
and overtime costs. It was noted how could a Collector’s position be
cut and then spent $100,000 on this.
President Craig noted that it always worked out well for the
not-for-profit organizations to sell the water and the soda and they
could commit to the time that they could afford. He stated he felt
the carnival would make plenty of money and do much better than in
the past few years. The question was called. Roll call:
AYES: Nicolosi, Packham, Eby, Manton, Kaiser
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENION: Carter
Motion carried
Motion by Trustee Eby and seconded to accept the Agreement as
written.
Roll call:
AYES: Nicolosi, Packham, Eby, Manton, Kaiser
NAYS: Carter
ABSENT: None
ABSTENION: None
Motion carried - Accepted the Agreement
|
|
Tabled: Direction for Human Relations Committee |
5-A.15
President Craig stated there was recent change to an additional
item on the Human Relations Committee. He suggested this be added to
the next Board meeting since there was some late information
received. Motion by Trustee Eby and seconded to Table this item
until the next meeting. Roll call:
AYES: Nicolosi, Packham, Eby, Kaiser
NAYS: Manton, Carter
ABSENT: None
ABSTENION: None
Motion carried - Tabled until next meeting
|
|
Approved: Warrant SWS590 in the Amount of $1,770,923.65 |
5-A.23
Motion by Trustee Eby and seconded to Approve Warrant SWS590 in the
Amount of $1,770,923.65. President Craig fielded questions on the
warrant. Roll call:
AYES: Nicolosi, Packham, Eby, Manton, Kaiser NAYS: Carter
ABSENT: None
Motion carried – Approved Warrant SWS590 in the Amount of
$1,770,923.65
|
|
Approved: Warrant SW591 in the Amount of $211,138.12 |
5-A.24
Motion by Trustee Manton and seconded to Approve Warrant SW591 in
the Amount of $211,138.12. President Craig fielded questions on the
warrant. Roll call:
AYES: Nicolosi, Packham, Eby, Manton, Carter, Kaiser NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
Motion carried – Approved Warrant SW591 in the Amount of
$211,138.12
|
|
6.
VILLAGE MANAGER’S REPORT – MARC HUMMEL Mr. Hummel announced that
at the dais was the Preliminary Fiscal Year 2009 Budget document. He
noted there would be scheduled a Special Board Meeting one week from
tonight, February 28, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. in Room 214 to begin the
review of this preliminary budget.
|
|
7.
VILLAGE CLERK’S REPORT – SHERRY L. CRAIG Clerk Craig had no
report.
|
|
8.
CORPORATION COUNSEL’S REPORT – NORMAN E. SAMELSON Mr. Samelson had
no report.
|
|
9.
VILLAGE TRUSTEES’ REPORTS |
| |
9-A.
JOSEPH J. NICOLOSI Trustee Nicolosi had no report.
|
|
9-B.
ROBERT D. PACKHAM Trustee Packham had no report.
|
|
9-C.
WESLEY E. EBY
Trustee Eby had no report.
|
|
9-D.
WILLIAM J. MANTON Trustee Manton had no report.
|
|
9-E.
TONI L. CARTER Trustee Carter had no report.
|
|
9-F.
LORI A. KAISER
Trustee Kaiser had no report.
|
| Adjourned Meeting |
10.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Trustee Eby and seconded to adjourn the meeting. Voice
vote: All AYES - Motion carried – President Craig adjourned the
Meeting at 9:25 P.M. |
|
Recorded and transcribed by,
Sherry L. Craig
Village Clerk |
|
Minutes
approved by President and Board of Trustees on this 13th
day of
March, 2008, as Amended.
_______________________________ Village President |
|
MEETING: PUBLIC
HEARING – Lake/Bartels Annexation Agreement VILLAGE OF HANOVER
PARK |
| |
DATE: February 21,
2008 |
|
LOCATION: MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2121 West Lake Street
Hanover Park, IL 60133 |
|
PRESENT:
Trustees Joseph Nicolosi, Robert Packham, Wesley Eby, William
Manton, Toni Carter, Lori Kaiser, and President Rodney Craig |
| |
The Public Hearing
was called to order by Village President Craig at 7:30 P.M.
Mr. Hummel stated the Petitioner, Mr. Richard Blaurock,
represented by Counsel, Mr. Tracy Kasson, were present. He stated
the topic was the annexation of the property at Lake Street and
Bartels Road in unincorporated DuPage County. He stated the
Petitioner was seeking annexation for the property to be zoned B-2
for the Comprehensive Plan to be amended and for a preliminary plat
of subdivision to be approved with the final action to be a
variance, which Mr. Hummel stated, would be explained later.
He continued that as background Regal Mall was a multi-tenant
commercial structure and the property was approximately 4.5 acres.
He noted, however, after the annexation of Bartels Road to the
municipality, it would comprise 3.8 acres.
He stated to the north and to the east of the property was
Turnberry Lakes Business Park, to the south was McDonald’s, and to
the west was Wendy’s. He noted the Comprehensive Plan showed this
parcel as business park, originally enacted due to the Turnberry
Lakes Business Park. He further noted with this annexation the
property would be zoned B-1 commercial, which he stated was
appropriate land use. He stated it was currently a single lot, but
as part of the annexation agreement, it would be subdivided so that
the south lot would continue with the Regal Mall (2 acres), and a
second lot would be created to the north comprised of 1.69 acres
fronting Bartels Road. He stated the Petitioner requested a variance
in terms of lot coverage from 75% to 77% and specifically a
consideration related to the property dedicated as a public
right-of-way. He stated the Development Commission reviewed all of
these topics and unanimously recommended (at two separate meetings)
all of the topics. He stated staff requested that board approve all
of the actions on the regular Board agenda: 1) An ordinance
authorizing the annexation agreement; 2) An ordinance authorizing
annexation of the property; 3) An ordinance amending the
Comprehensive Plan to establish the commercial zoning; 4) A variance
be granted related to lot coverage and use of a septic system on the
property; and 5) A preliminary plat of subdivision be approved.
Clerk Craig stated she had met Mr. Blaurock at the International
Shopping Center Convention in Las Vegas several years ago and that
was when this process started. She stated she was happy to see this
through fruition and she wanted to be the first to welcome him into
the Village of Hanover Park!
President Craig stated these ordinances were in the agenda for
approval labeled as items 5-A.18 through 5-A.22.
Motion by Trustee Manton and seconded to adjourn the public
hearing. VOICE Vote: All AYES. President Craig adjourned the meeting
at 7:37 P.M. |
|
Recorded
and transcribed by,
Sherry L. Craig
Village Clerk |
| |
Minutes
approved by President and Board of Trustees on this 6th
day of March, 2008.
_______________________________
Village President |
|
|



Village of Hanover Park
2121 West Lake Street
Hanover Park, IL 60133
(630) 372-4200
Hours:
Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays & Fridays, 8:00 am - 4:30 pm
Thursday, 8:00 am - 7:30 pm
All information © 2008 Village of Hanover Park, Illinois
|