Mr.
Hummel stated Trustee Kaiser called him to state she was called into
work. He stated this was the presentation for the Preliminary Fiscal
Year 2009 Budget and tentatively scheduled was a meeting for Monday
evening, if needed. He stated he would present the general fund
budget, the departments within the general fund, and the capital
projects associated with that.
He stated this preliminary budget formed the basis with consensus
from the elected officials prior to the drafting of the final
budget, with submittal by April 17, 2008 the formal budget as
required by statute. He noted the general fund was balanced with all
expenditures and revenues included. He commented this was a dynamic
process and one truism was that things always changed. He stated
there were significant changes from when this process began last
November. He included a 3% increase in the health care benefit
cooperative, and unfortunately, stated he was notified the costs
were 8% more, an increase of $136,000 which the budget needed to
absorb. He also noted the elimination of the Collector position. He
continued that his recommendation as submitted continued to stand.
He added that resources were needed to pay the added health care
cost.
He stated the booklet contained three (3) sections: the Narrative
Memorandum, the Budget Exhibits, and C.I.P. (the Capital Improvement
Program).
He continued the Narrative highlighted revenues and expenditure
topics and presented policy discussions; the Exhibits provided
accounting and fund issues including expenditures and revenues; the
C.I.P. provided a listing of the major capital improvement items
generally defined as greater than a $10,000 one-time purchase. He
stated each one had a page with a more detailed description of that
request and finally there was a future glimpse of the capital needs
of the Village.
Mr. Hummel stated the overview of the budget included 22 separate
funds and was 4% greater than the prior year, and key highlights
were proposed with 4 additional full-time employees, including 2
Police patrol officers as well as 2 Code Enforcement officers. He
stated there were significant allocations for the following:
acquisition of land for the purposes of future municipal building
expansion; 50th anniversary special events; public safety
pension plans; seed money for the creation of the Hanover Park
Chamber of Commerce; and funding of public safety positions
decreasing the "sinking" fund for the fleet services program. He
stated consultant fees were reduced in the public information
division. He requested an approximate 10-year review of the
Comprehensive Plan and an update to the Zoning Ordinance. He
recommended a 4.5% property tax increase which was within the Truth
in Taxation limitations, and noted the Board already had adopted a 4
year 8% water and 4.5% sewer rate increase. He also noted there were
increases in user fees including ambulance and rental residential
inspection fees.
He stated some of the capital projects highlighted included a
grant for a bike path along the Northern Gas Pipeline (NGPL),
reconstruction of a concrete street, specifically Tanglewood Avenue,
a significant allocation for IT in the form of hardware and
software, the Creek Bank repair program north of Walnut Avenue, and
an approval of an expanded water main replacement program for
$500,000. He continued to comply with state mandates we budgeted for
construction of a dissolved oxygen tank associated with the
Wastewater Treatment Plant, replacement of a Fire Pumper engine, and
finally, the purchase of a 2½ ton dump truck in the fleet division.
He stated moving into the expenditure operating components
Village-wide, all 22 funds aggregated into the following statistics.
The full-time salaries account was 6% or $692,000 greater than the
prior year, which included the 4 additional employees as well as
contract provisions for those not covered by a contract, a 2% across
the board increase and a merit adjustment up to 3% and up to 4% for
supervisory and management personnel positions.
He stated in the public safety divisions, a greater overtime
allocation was budgeted and the health insurance allocation of 3%
was incorrect and the new reviewed number was 8% or $136,000. He
stated pension costs for public safety employees increased
approximately 10% or $280,000, these costs being received by the
actuarial. President Craig asked for the total health insurance
costs and Mr. Hummel stated it was $2.69 million in the 2009 budget
representing an 8.2% increase.
Mr. Hummel continued that gasoline increased significantly and
26% more was budgeted and that it impacted all of the operating
funds for an additional $62,000. He stated for the first time the
Village was incurring general fund natural gas costs; in the past
under Northern Illinois Gas costs were franchise free therms and
with advent of the additional buildings next year we budgeted $8,500
to cover the therm usage beyond what we were granted in our
franchise allotment. He stated liability costs were up 12% or
$84,000. He stated a key reduction allowed us to increase our public
safety staffing by reducing the contribution to the fleet sinking
fund by $150,000 or 16%. He stated over the years we have kept our
vehicles longer than the life cycle projections allowing us a
surplus to use those dollars to fund additional safety positions. He
stated training increased $22,000 based upon basic training costs as
well as other contributions to continuing education programs in
several departments. He stated finally the special events budget was
approximately $235,000, noting there were revenues incorporated into
the budget to defray the costs, about $117,000 net cost.
It was commented that the health insurance premiums for 200+
employees seemed exorbitant and asked if we had sought other
alternatives. Mr. Hummel stated it was being looked at right now but
it was a very complex topic with many components. Basically, he
commented, losses directly determined costs and overall, the health
care costs over the last 10 years averaged a 12% increase. He stated
while it seemed high, the insurance pool fluctuated but he felt it
gave reliable coverage. Another comment made was there were only two
police officers in the budget and it was requested that there be
more and it needed another look. Mr. Hummel stated it was his
recommendation to increase staff incrementally based upon available
revenues and he stated concern over the reliability of some of the
revenues. He concluded he heard the Board, but the revenues were not
there to support more than two at this time as he provided a
balanced budget.
It was questioned how much employees contributed to the costs of
insurance and Ms. Richard answered it was in the range of 3½% to 10%
of the premium costs. It was questioned if perhaps the employees
should pay more and Mr. Hummel answered an element of that was in
the labor contract and noted there were various plans and some were
less costly than others. It was questioned how many were in unions
and answered approximately 2/3 of the employees were covered by the
Teamsters, MAP, or IAFF contracts. It was then questioned how many
union contracts we negotiated with and answered technically with
four, an additional union did not provide health care, the POC (paid
on call). He noted in FY’09 we had two contracts up, the IAFF and
the MAP contract, stating we were coming off a 4-year IAFF contract,
and a 3-year MAP program. It was then noted that 1/3 of employees
were administrative and general employees and that they were not
paying their fair share of costs as in the private sector. Mr.
Hummel stated if we tried to balance the budget with the 1/3 of
other employees that it may very well create another union.
It was questioned why it cost $105,000 each for the police
officers when recruiting these officers from universities. Mr.
Hummel stated the itemized costs incorporated the pension costs for
public safety employees and this was an enormous cost with
legislators only increasing them. He noted that health care was fast
approaching the cost of the salary and stated that historically
governmental employees focused on benefits rather than compensation.
Discussion continued on benefits. It was noted that we do need to
have comparables with union and non-union positions and that which
is in the private sector for unions did not even come close to the
municipal sector.
President Craig added that he did not feel two officers were
enough as he was looking for a total of 9 officers over three years,
with four this year, three next year, and two the following year.
Mr. Hummel explained the chart on page 5 and noted it was very
important. He noted the FY09 request column and explained at the 2nd
to the bottom line there was a $21,190 amount and that was the
number of all the total operating revenues of $22 million, noting
the budget was balanced by $21,000. He stated at the same time the
recommended budget proposed to draw down on our "savings account" by
$1.9 million. He stated there was history there and he wanted to
emphasize that the operating revenues were up 5%, operating
expenditures were up 5% and as proposed there was a $21,000 positive
balance in the corporate fund.
Trustee Kaiser arrived at 8:12 p.m.
He stated in terms of general fund revenues, property tax next
year projected a $348,000 addition based upon 4%. He stated the
sales tax had gone up and in contrast the real estate transfer tax
went down due to the substantial downturn in the real estate market
that revenue source was down $129,000 or 64% than the prior year. He
noted the state income tax was probably the driver of the budget and
was projected at a 6% increase which was an additional $180,000 and
in the summary, the proposed multi-family license increase from $50
to $85 per dwelling unit (apartment), generated an additional
$31,000. He noted initiating the new rental residential program for
single family attached/detatched and duplex units was a $180 fee
which would pay for the 4th additional employee in Code
Enforcement, making it a revenue neutral program. He noted the
ambulance fees were to be increased along with federal guidelines
generating an additional $80,000. And in contrast, he noted
impoundment fees were down $90,000 from the prior year and the
interest on investments with recent federal action reducing rates
showed a $35,000 drop in that revenue. He also pointed out the SAFER
grant allowed us to fund firefighters in prior years would drop off
by $30,000 next year, and the Family Festival was a one-time
expenditure for a net cost of $135,000. He continued the Fire
District used to generate property tax monies from Countryside and
this was reduced by $85,000. In summary, he stated the general
corporate revenues were up 3%.
President Craig noted Streamwood enacted an impoundment ordinance
and he questioned if that had an impact on our impoundments and
Chief Moser stated no it did not. Further discussion noted that
Streamwood’s impoundment was not enacted yet, nor did it include all
that was in our ordinance.
The Code Enforcement officer position regarding the single family
rental program was questioned and further clarification was given.
Vehicle Impoundments were further discussed with clarifications on
an unfavorable court ruling reducing the number of impounds by 20%,
and noting the number of officers available reduced that number. The
possibility of using contractual services was brought up and the
Police Department was going to evaluate the costs.
Mr. Hummel stated the Police Department’s overall budget
increased 6% and the biggest topic was staffing. He stated the
Police Department had identified their need of hiring between 9 and
19 officers to be adequately staffed. He pointed out the history and
the future hiring of officers and stated over a 10-year period for
public safety personnel, the cost had doubled. He further pointed
out if the Board wanted to hire more than what he recommended, page
38 listed additional revenue sources to do so. He noted next year
property would be re-assessed in the Village and that would increase
monies.
Mr. Hummel continued that we budgeted for 52 officers and yet
there were not 52 on the street. He stated this was an inherent
problem, with many officers off for various reasons, be it health
issues, training, retirement, resignation, etc. He reiterated his
recommendation was 2 and he would be happy to add more through a
Board directive along with a revenue source to increase it. Mr.
Hummel reviewed the capital projects for the Police Department.
Mr. Hummel stated the Fire Department budget increased 6% and
pension costs increased $96,000 or 26% more than the previous year.
He noted there were two initiatives: the ambulance service
accreditation program at a cost of $11,000; and improvement of the
commercial fire code inspection program. He noted that the Battalion
Chief testing allocation should have been $7,070 and not $16,000 as
noted on page 10. He stated included were testing costs for Paid on
Call (POC) firefighters. He stated there were other fire costs which
included mandated elevator maintenance and a new microwave link
between the Village Hall and Fire Station 2.
He continued describing the capital projects for the Fire
Department. He mentioned that Engine 361 was not 40 years old as
indicated on page 10 but 30 years old. He noted while the engine
would probably not be delivered in FY’10, he did not want to sign a
contract without the dollars budgeted. He stated that six new carbon
monoxide blood monitors were on listed at a cost of $3,750 each for
a total of $22,500.
Mr. Hummel continued that the Public Works portion of the budget
included Administration, Streets, Forestry, Public Buildings and
Fleet Services as well as Engineering and their costs were increased
3% from last year. He summarized that $3,000 was allocated for
NIPSTA (Northern Illinois Public Safety Training Academy) membership
and that the facility was located at the former Glenview Naval
facility.
Mr. Hummel noted the sidewalk reimbursement program was very
successful and they had increased reimbursement from $3 to $4 per
square foot. He continued that Forestry budgeted $8,500 for
contractual landscape at
Ontarioville Park, Memorial Park and Greenbrook Boulevard and
$5,100 was budgeted for a part-time seasonal employee during the
spring and summer.
He noted a major asset was our parkway trees and the new Emerald
Ash Borer (EAB) problem has been identified and they proposed
$15,000 for a removal and replacement program. He stated another
$18,000 was budgeted for tree removal due to wind storms and age.
Various other programs outlined in the budget booklet were
discussed.
He stated in the Public Buildings, the shooting range had $8,000
budgeted for lead clean-up and $7,000 budgeted for installation of
safety equipment in elevators. In the Fleet Services, monies were
budgeted for auto parts, as well as drive cam support and managerial
services.
He highlighted some of the various capital projects: the Creek
Bank Repairs, the salt brine making equipment, Lake Street concrete
median improvements, parkway trees, Village banners, and the
replacement of a dump truck.
He noted Engineering had a list of budgeted capital projects such
as the Lake Street Streetscape at $160,000, five new streetlights
were allocated, the NGPL bike path in which $530,000 was allocated
and federal grant monies were expected, the Tanglewood Avenue street
reconstruction at $250,000, the completion of the Army Trail Road
Arterial Fence, the Irving Park Road Streetscape Phase 3, and the
Storm Sewer headwall construction.
It was noted that our streets had fewer potholes than other
communities due to our street reconstruction program and kudos were
given to Mr. Beckman in Engineering for the effective way of
handling our streets.